🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations produced results, and revealed fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations exercised their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations restart.

Trump recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He said the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the primary answer to settle disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."